1.3. Sardinia Archaeology and Culture Nuraghi (old fortress) to visit

1.3.1 The Nuraghes and the Archaeological sites

Photo FonteSarda - Megalithic Complex 1998 - Pranu Muteddu Goni (CA) - Precedent to the Nuraghic period

In the preceding epochs we had an architecture characterized from Menhir and from necropolis hypogeums, as in the example represented above. Subsequently, after the varied preceding cultures the Nuraghic period begins Nuraghic civilization, with the end of the age of the Ancient Bronze, around 1.600 B.C.. The architecture developed by this civilization elaborates, besides the Nuraghic towers, also numerous megalithic burials, said graves of the giants to form of taurine head (taurine protome), and some testimonies of places of cult.

The giants' grave Is Concias XIII century before the birth of Christ - Quartucciu Place St. Pietro Paradiso

Photo FonteSarda 2000 Quartuccius - the giants' Grave Is Concias XIII century B.C.

In the age of the Recent and Final Bronze, instead we see, realized the greatest part of that places of cult denominated temples to well, where tied up ceremonies to the cult of the waters were unwound. Sardinia is interested, besides, from the Mycenaean navigation, that brings in the island new people, presumably attracted by his important mining resources. also thanks to the due push to importations of metallic objects from the island in Cyprus.

Characteristics of the first age of the Iron the production of the manufactured articles in bronze of good level, the realization of weapons and objects of ornament, the production of small bronze (small statues in bronze), of the votive small boat and of other objects in miniature. In the following phase to the production of small bronze it is placed side by side, besides, the realization of great statues in stone.

1.3.2. List of Nuraghic fortress and Archaeological Sites

SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) is a law of the United States proposed in 2011 to fight online trafficking in copyrighted intellectual property and counterfeit goods. Proposals include barring advertising networks and payment facilities from conducting business with allegedly infringing websites, barring search engines from linking to the sites, and requiring Internet service providers (ISP) to block access to the sites. The bill would criminalize the streaming of such content, with a maximum penalty of five years in prison.
User-content websites such as YouTube, but not only, would be greatly affected, and concern has been expressed that they may be shut down if the bill becomes law. Opponents state the legislation would enable law enforcement to remove an entire internet domain due to something posted on a single blog, arguing that an entire online community could be punished for the actions of a tiny minority. The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) includes the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act, the copyright owners are required to request the site to remove the infringing material within a certain amount of time. SOPA would bypass this "safe harbor" provision by placing the responsibility for detecting and policing infringement onto the site itself.
This is serious problem Freedom of speech and Freedom of information: The president Obama, mentioned on the Texas Insider: "will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression".
On October 28, 2011, the EFF called the bill a "massive piece of job-killing Internet regulation," and said, "This bill cannot be fixed; it must be killed."
Nancy Pelosi is far from the only member of Congress opposed to the legislation. On Tuesday, ten members of Congress signed a "dear colleague" letter expressing concerns with the bill. The signers were nine Democrats plus Republican Ron Paul, a libertarian-leaning candidate for the GOP presidential nomination.
SOPA, they write, is "overly broad and would cause serious and long term damage to the technology industry, one of the few bright spots in our economy." The representatives warned that SOPA would result in "an explosion of innovation-killing lawsuits and litigation."
Also opposed to the legislation is Republican Darrel Issa. "I don't believe this bill has any chance on the House floor," Issa told The Hill on Wednesday. "I think it’s way too extreme, it infringes on too many areas that our leadership will know is simply too dangerous to do in its current form."